@marianne-van-es said in What Happened to Accuracy?:
@ekto-gamat wasnt it you that told us you played a game that granted wishes from players to change and listened to all needs of players? and that game is no longer there....
Not that extreme in granting all wishes, but more or less. Is that what you think happened here? Too many complaints about misses so SP "silently" made all attacks 100% accurate?
I loved classic duels not because I won but because I learned, I wont spend 20 gems on grand duels that price is to much, would have spend an occasional 5 end on challenge not occasional I would have spend... I didnt need a smaller pool of monsters I loved the fact I won 1 or 2 classic duels with a "bad"team maybe because of no 100% accuracy. I can understand some combinations of monsters would be not allowed because of it being to good or to bad. Sure I want to win always but first I want to learn and classic was perfect for that, Grand is to expensive
A tad off topic, but I fully agree here. Classic duels were fine as they were.
Grand is too expensive. Pool of monsters shrank because people complained being offered sub par monsters? I am actually missing a few excellent ones I used before.
If so, SP should really stop listening to people with big mouths who go on a tantrum every time they lose.
The strength of live duels is that you can play with monsters you don't even own. It's fun. Statistically you should lose 50% of your battles. I guess that loss ratio is too much for some people to swallow.
Former co-lead of Resurrection of AMAB and Untamable; Retired: Parked in the Fifth Element; Make War, not Races