So as the title says, do you plan to use it? How?

Me personally as a collector I plan to use it and use it to it's fullest eventually. My plan is to reduce all my elemental habs down to just one for every element except Terra and Flame, those two I plan to get rid of. The monsters in the remaining elemental habs will only be high earners with team gold runes.

Then I plan to replace all the hab spots with legendary habs so that I can hatch my storage monsters, finally.

Lastly I plan to replace all the breedable rare, epic and legend monsters I got rid of in case they come up as breeding parents in breeding events.

Once all this is done, I hope to be able to use it to house the epic fails during breeding events so that I can extract them at my leisure as well as any storage duplicates I have so they will be hatched and ready to extract at my leisure as well.

Hopefully I can implement my plan without having to put any legendaries in the super hab except maybe the breedable ones.

I am not going to lie, I am looking forward to this building, and hopefully like the DC one it will be very useful to me.

Thinking in the same line but also keep in mind that some rares are very usefull in the gold department so im looking forward in planning and figuring out what's best

To keep disappointment to a minimum, I am making zero plans or expectations until it is released. Even when it is released, I doubt it will live up to its description of 'Super'.

@Marianne-van-Es yeah i have a coupke of high earners. My first wave will be to retire the low earners first. I spent several hours listing the earnings of all my monsters.

The hard part is buying and upgrading legend habs for replacements. I might start with those low earners just to clear room so i can do more than one at a time.

@Keith-Romberg said in Super Hab - What are your Plans for it?:

To keep disappointment to a minimum, I am making zero plans or expectations until it is released. Even when it is released, I doubt it will live up to its description of 'Super'.

My expectations is it will be like DCs Dragonarium so i am making plans based on that. And saving gems to use just as it is in DC. I have a minor advantage here because i know about DCs costs and how much i am willing to spend based on that. I just hope if it has similar costs they will also have similar sales on the costs.

@Keith-Romberg said in Super Hab - What are your Plans for it?:

To keep disappointment to a minimum, I am making zero plans or expectations until it is released. Even when it is released, I doubt it will live up to its description of 'Super'.

Same here, let's see what we get. Probably hold 5 instead of 4, big whoop.

@Keith-Romberg said in Super Hab - What are your Plans for it?:

To keep disappointment to a minimum, I am making zero plans or expectations until it is released. Even when it is released, I doubt it will live up to its description of 'Super'.

Do you know Marvin the Robot from Hitchhiker's Guide To the Galaxy? I am wondering. Did he teach you or did you teach him? (OT: Alan Rickman did a SUPERB job playing his voice)

@Nynaevelan My plan will be similar to yours I think, although I still have one more island to buy, so I have a bit of time left.

I still have plenty of space, so I will continue to play normally, collecting monsters, upgrading the habitats until the time I will need the help of the Super Hab.

@Bruce-Hamilton said in Super Hab - What are your Plans for it?:

@Keith-Romberg said in Super Hab - What are your Plans for it?:

To keep disappointment to a minimum, I am making zero plans or expectations until it is released. Even when it is released, I doubt it will live up to its description of 'Super'.

Same here, let's see what we get. Probably hold 5 instead of 4, big whoop.

It is not a habitat with just 5 instead of 4 monster . it is a storing building
so If we got the same building as dragon city then you can move hundreds of monsters to it -- assume you bought the slot first --

probably we will get few slot for free first to test the building before buying slots for gems

@Nynaevelan I think your motivations in this game are essentially the same as mine: I like collecting. I've technically still got space, and could consolidate for another habitat or two if needed, but am REALLY excited about the Super Habitat. Or literally any storage solution. I'm like you, I won't have a problem with spending gems to store a few hundred monsters.

I can still buy 3 or 4 more islands, so I have no use for the Super Habitat, although I do need to get rid of some elemental habitats (currently got 3 water, 1 light, 2 metal, 2 magic, 3 dark, 3 fire, 2 thunder, 2 earth, 3 nature) and start building more level 8 metal habitats...

I am getting a bit bored with collecting gold every 30 minutes. So I am going to put anything that is metal in a metal habitat, and what is the next valuable one, Light? Then Magic or Dark?

No need for thunder or earth habitats at all really.

@Clackers said in Super Hab - What are your Plans for it?:

I can still buy 3 or 4 more islands, so I have no use for the Super Habitat, although I do need to get rid of some elemental habitats (currently got 3 water, 1 light, 2 metal, 2 magic, 3 dark, 3 fire, 2 thunder, 2 earth, 3 nature) and start building more level 8 metal habitats...

I am getting a bit bored with collecting gold every 30 minutes. So I am going to put anything that is metal in a metal habitat, and what is the next valuable one, Light? Then Magic or Dark?

No need for thunder or earth habitats at all really.

Ok I understand getting rid of some but the waters should stay, but you need more light and dark. I only have 1 terra and flame, 3 nature, 3 magic, 3 metal, 2 thunder, 5 light and 9 dark. My real money makers are in the light and dark habs. My light and darks will be the last to be downsized.

@Clackers said in Super Hab - What are your Plans for it?:

. So I am going to put anything that is metal in a metal habitat, and what is the next valuable one, Light? Then Magic or Dark?

See the other topic :
https://forums.socialpointgames.com/post/15936

@Haka-Taka The link is broken.

I don't think internal links work on this site. Same with notifications. If I click on one, it says "Ooops, looks like something went wrong!"

@Clackers
Strange i just tested it on normal account and it works fine
can you try again

@Haka-Taka Nope, it keeps saying Internal Error. Might be my browser, am I using IE...

@Clackers said in Super Hab - What are your Plans for it?:

@Haka-Taka The link is broken.

I don't think internal links work on this site. Same with notifications. If I click on one, it says "Ooops, looks like something went wrong!"

It's something with your device, it works for me.

No idea since I don't even know how exactly will that super habitat work.
Does anyone know for certain how it will work?

@Haka-Taka said in Super Hab - What are your Plans for it?:
> It is not a habitat with just 5 instead of 4 monster . it is a storing building

so If we got the same building as dragon city then you can move hundreds of monsters to it -- assume you bought the slot first

After paying gems to buy the monster, you pay more gems to store it? Why don't we just add Social Point to all of our bank accounts, about what it amounts to.

@Simon771 said in Super Hab - What are your Plans for it?:

Does anyone know for certain how it will work?

No, and SP feels wild speculation to run rampant is better than spending two minutes to give out the high level details. I guess they have gotten too use to dealing with outrage and complete disgust.

They could make that super habitat to let you store let's say 100 monsters.
For free.

But that wouldn't produce any gold at all.
Now if you upgrade it with gems, capacity will increase from 0 gold to lets say 5M gold.
And next upgrade even more.

I wouldn't want to see it be able to hold more than 15-20M ... I could live with that aspect of pay to win.

@Simon771 said in Super Hab - What are your Plans for it?:

They could make that super habitat to let you store let's say 100 monsters.
For free.

But that wouldn't produce any gold at all.
Now if you upgrade it with gems, capacity will increase from 0 gold to lets say 5M gold.
And next upgrade even more.

I wouldn't want to see it be able to hold more than 15-20M ... I could live with that aspect of pay to win.

I doubt they will implement something like this, there is very little benefit in this for them, I doubt many would update for gems if they had a choice.

@Simon771 said in Super Hab - What are your Plans for it?:

They could make that super habitat to let you store let's say 100 monsters.
For free.

But that wouldn't produce any gold at all.
Now if you upgrade it with gems, capacity will increase from 0 gold to lets say 5M gold.
And next upgrade even more.

I wouldn't want to see it be able to hold more than 15-20M ... I could live with that aspect of pay to win.

100 slot free is just too much
In dragon city you get 3 or 5 slots free then you can unlock later and of course the price of slots will increase
there is no gold production from those monsters in storage and probably the same here , SP nerfed our gold farm monsters after all

But many players will use it to store war monsters and hatch even more gold producer ,, wonder how many gold #1 in gold fever will earn after that

@Simon771 said in Super Hab - What are your Plans for it?:

They could make that super habitat to let you store let's say 100 monsters.
For free.

But that wouldn't produce any gold at all.
Now if you upgrade it with gems, capacity will increase from 0 gold to lets say 5M gold.
And next upgrade even more.

I wouldn't want to see it be able to hold more than 15-20M ... I could live with that aspect of pay to win.

From some of the hints/mentions of it, you should be able to collect gold, select them for breeding, select them for fighting with, and so on. Based on that, I would guess it going to cost gems to open slots up. I am not please with that at all since it is most likely going to be expensive to open slots and it will not be solving the space problem.

@Keith-Romberg
what you think is the right price for a slot ? and how they price should increase ?

The super habitat should fall inline with all the normal habitats where they cost gold and food to upgrade. The whole point of the super habitat was to solve the space problem, not a bottomless sink hole for gems to handle the countless number of monsters SP is churning out. Nothing else in the game for storage has ever cost gems. Habitats and islands always required gold and/or food.

@Keith-Romberg said in Super Hab - What are your Plans for it?:

The super habitat should fall inline with all the normal habitats where they cost gold and food to upgrade. The whole point of the super habitat was to solve the space problem, not a bottomless sink hole for gems to handle the countless number of monsters SP is churning out. Nothing else in the game for storage has ever cost gems. Habitats and islands always required gold and/or food.

That would be ideal but I think highly unlikely to happen. If I look back on the pattern of SP when they delivered on what we asked/demanded both in DC and ML, they seem to require gems. Maybe it will release for gems than after all the complaints they change it, such as what they did for the habitat upgrades in DC. But I am not going to hold my breath on it. Their answer to the outrage over the dragonarium prices in DC is to offer half off sales. The highest slot costs 50 gems per slot, so even at 25 that is still pretty expensive. When it was first released the costs ranged from 3 to 10 gems and the slots were unlimited. Then they limited the slots to 300 and increased the prices from 5 to 50. @Two years later they added another 120 slots for the high end prices. So I am not going to hold my breath that this same building will be just for gold and/or food. I am going to assume it is about the same as the DC building and plan accordingly. Oh and like DC, I will be doing those tasks and using free gems only for slots.

I think that SP will create a new island for the super habitat.

What I have been saying since the beginning, if SP charges gems for the use of the super habitat, it will solve nothing and only create a huge backlash against it. I think SP is creating a ****storm that will not be able to handle. The lack of any real information is even worse.

So, from what I've read here, we won't be getting an appropriate solution to our backlog of eggs already in storage & lack of space in habitats already full to the brim...I realise that it's only speculation, but...

Funny thing is that I have asked SP repeatedly about doing something for hatching times to help with dealing 100s of eggs in storage. The answer is always, hatching times are what they are expected to be and will not change. Plus there are enough events where hatching times are reduced. Really, that is the most BS answer I have heard.

I disagree with some of the comments here, give me an example of one game that has changed their standard practices to accommodate your backlog of storage items? While I would like something more permanent then the random hatching events with shortened times it is quite unrealistic to expect them to be changed. For example there is one game which I play that you can buy VIP tickets, with these tickets you get shortened breeding and hatching times, an extra boost on gold earnings and more pvp points. There are other benefits but those are the ones that are similar. As much as I buy when I do, I would be on board with something like this to give me an extra boost.

I must say it amazes the amount of freebies and extras that are demanded from SP, when in fact many want to be f2p. SP is a business first and foremost, while some of their business practices make me shutter, and a lot of their prices are high, we as the consumers make the choice to support their product, buying those features that we choose to spend our money on. If you put no money into it, you shouldn't expect to get much out of it. Now for some of us our time is more valuable than our cash, so my philosophy is if you are not getting your time's worth, then it is time to find something that does give you what you are looking for.

Wooh I say all that to say, I understand some of the discontent that many are feeling, but please do not rain on my parade. I am looking for ideas and positive feedback here, if you do not have any to offer, move on and stopping ruining my Zen...

@Nynaevelan said in Super Hab - What are your Plans for it?:

give me an example of one game that has changed their standard practices to accommodate your backlog of storage items?

Dragon Soul. They do things where SP continually drops the ball. New features and monsters are well thought out and tested before being released. New features and things get heavy input from the user community. When things go wrong because something they do, they compensate the community for their mistake. Because of these and many others, they have been getting my business/money the last 6 to 8 months and not SP. I have given money to SP since I have begun playing the game over three years now. I dont expect things for free, bu there is no way I am going to continue to support all the **** they have been putting out the last year or so with zero regard to the player community, especially the paying ones.

I am about to the breaking point of this game. Another completely thought out and poorly implemented feature from SP will be it. If SP has any desire and/or concern about getting my business/money again, they need to do a serious revamp of quality of the game and the whole release process they have.

@Nynaevelan not sure which one of us you meant was a f2p player... We're not asking for freebies here, as we stump out a lot to buy, breed, hatch, feed, extract, rank these monsters...none of which are cheap. Asking for a level of continuity to carry on with our spending spree (however mediocre it may seem to you), is not a big ask from where I'm sitting. After all, there are more books, more monsters for the triple element/book wars that is needed, & we are only asking for more space to be able to do so! I am so tired of playing musical monsters to rank these stupid monsters! Your parade is not my concern, but room to get my legends ranked up is! Just for your information, kromberg (as he was known in the old forum), was never a f2p player, but instead has heavily invested in this game...& this I clearly know from his days at Amab! His level of spending & mine far exceeds yours as a collector! All well & good, if you want to be an SP cheerleader, but that doesn't mean that we are asking for the moon!

@ss13 said in Super Hab - What are your Plans for it?:

@Nynaevelan not sure which one of us you meant was a f2p player... We're not asking for freebies here, as we stump out a lot to buy, breed, hatch, feed, extract, rank these monsters...none of which are cheap. Asking for a level of continuity to carry on with our spending spree (however mediocre it may seem to you), is not a big ask from where I'm sitting. After all, there are more books, more monsters for the triple element/book wars that is needed, & we are only asking for more space to be able to do so! I am so tired of playing musical monsters to rank these stupid monsters! Your parade is not my concern, but room to get my legends ranked up is! Just for your information, kromberg (as he was known in the old forum), was never a f2p player, but instead has heavily invested in this game...& this I clearly know from his days at Amab! His level of spending & mine far exceeds yours as a collector! All well & good, if you want to be an SP cheerleader, but that doesn't mean that we are asking for the moon!

Taking this a little personal, much? And why is it when a mod, myself specifically, differs with your opinion I have to be a SP cheerleader. My opinion is invalid because I chose to help with the forums? But all that aside, I will not go into who spends more because frankly it is irrelevant, you nor kromberg was targeted in my response. How about an answer to the question posed? And as stated by you yourself, this is all speculation on our part so how you can you make the assumption that an appropriate solution would not be given for storage issues. What exactly that is, you have not stated.

I like to suggest holding the discussion till the feature is on so we know exactly what we have ,,, we can suggest clear improvement to it and so